Ilagan to lead USC sans vice-chairperson

breaking[FIRST UPDATE: 10:27pm, April 24] This year’s UPLB University Student Council and College Student Council (USC-CSC) elections concluded with only 25.92% of the student population voting, or only 2578 out of 9943 students.

The voter turnout remained low despite the extension of the voting period during the second day to 5pm for college precincts and 7pm for the major precinct at Humanities building.

John Joseph “JJ” Ilagan of Samahan ng Kabataan para sa Bayan (SAKBAYAN) won the chairpersonship with 1319 votes.1259 students opted to abstain.

Meanwhile, with 1477 voters abstaining, Dannette “Dante” Sunga failed to bag the position of vice-chairperson. Sunga garnered 1101 votes.

During the meetings of the Central Electoral Board (CEB), it was discussed that in case a position remained vacant owing to a higher number of abstain votes, a snap election will be conducted immediately.

The new USC councilors are as follows:
Maria Angelica Abanilla, SAKBAYAN (843 votes)
Francis Andrei De Sagun, SAKBAYAN (729 votes)
Ervin Gandicela, SAKBAYAN (764 votes)
Sean Javier, SAKBAYAN (776 votes)
Marc Julian Manongdo, INDEPENDENT (987 votes)
Patricia Mae Mayor, SAKBAYAN (1088 votes)
Karl Benz Montesines, SAKBAYAN (820 votes)
Alfredo Palasin, SAKBAYAN (752 votes)
Peter Michael Separa, SAKBAYAN (807 votes)
Jasper Sunga, SAKBAYAN (882 votes)

The voter turnout per college is as follows:
CAFS – 35.55%
CEAT – 29.07%
CHE – 24.20%
CHE Online – 17.95%
CAS – 25.75%
CEM – 32.01%
CVM -34.09%
CDC – 48.90%
CFNR – 58.62%
GS -1.88%
The scheduled election proper was on April 18-19. However, the second day of the election was moved to April 24 due to a power outage in the campus last April19. #UPLBvotes

WORDS: Caren Malaluan

Advertisements

SAKBAYAN USC slate runs unopposed this election

22264856_1827425027284809_483445919_n

Unlike previous UPLB University Student Council (USC) elections, this year’s candidates for the USC positions, except for the college representatives and an independent councilor, are from one political party only.

Last March 20, 2018, the Central Electoral Board (CEB) released the approved initial list of candidates for this year’s UPLB USC and College Student Council (CSC) elections.

Candidates that filed candidacy for the positions of USC chairperson, vice-chairperson, and councilors are all under Samahan ng Kabataan para sa Bayan (SAKBAYAN). No candidates from BUKLOD-UPLB filed for the said USC positions.

While BUKLOD-UPLB is not fielding any candidates for the USC positions and other CSC positions, the political party has a slate for the College of Arts and Sciences (CAS) student council polls sans the councilors. Patricia Isabel Leron, Landcel Clarence Arcedo, and Vince Harvey Juan of BUKLOD-UPLB all filed candidacy for CAS representative, chairperson, and vice-chairperson, respectively.

 

USC-CSC Candidates vs. Abstain and Snap Elections

The approved initial list of candidates for the USC polls includes incumbent USC vice-chairperson John Joseph Ilagan and USC councilors Ervin Gandicela, Patricia Mae Mayor, and Danette Sunga with Ilagan and Sunga running for USC chairperson and vice-chairperson, respectively. Meanwhile, both Gandicela and Mayor are re-electionists.

Incumbent Graduate School (GS) representative to the USC, Marc Julian Manongdo also filed his independent candidacy for USC councilor.

As the SAKBAYAN standard bearers and most of the candidates for the CSC top positions run unopposed, the unopposed candidate, to be declared as an election winner, should win against the abstain votes by garnering at least fifty one percent of the total votes as per the new CEB ruling. Unopposed candidates who failed to obtain the required fifty one percent of total votes will not be acknowledged as winners.

In cases where there is no apparent winner for a specific position due to either a loss to abstain votes or a tie, a snap election must be conducted immediately on the following semester after the election (1st Semester A.Y. 2018-2019) as per the new CEB ruling.

Moreover, a snap election for the chairperson position in the College of Development Communication (CDC) is expected to take place on the following semester after incumbent CDC councilor and unopposed CDC chairperson candidate Albert John Enrico Dominguez withdrew his candidacy.

In a letter submitted to the CEB on March 26, Dominguez cited personal matters as the main reason for his decision to withdraw his candidacy. The following day, March 27, the CEB approved the candidacy withdrawal of Dominguez.

 Electoral activities

On March 16, 2018, Chancellor Fernando Sanchez issued a memorandum encouraging all UPLB students to participate in the electoral activities for this year’s USC-CSC elections. The following are the 2018 USC-CSC electoral activities:

Date and Time Activity
March 22 (1:00 pm) – April 17 (11:59 pm) USC-CSC Elections Campaign Period
April 10 (7:00 pm) Campus Forum
Before April 16 (7:00 pm) CSC Miting de Avance
April 16 (7:00 pm) USC Miting de Avance

The election proper will be on April 18-19. [P]

Words: Caren Malaluan

PHSA Students denounce admin’s move to add Imelda Marcos’ initials to the MARIA Scholarship

22264856_1827425027284809_483445919_n

MARIA (Makiling Academy and Research Institute for the Arts) Scholarship given to Philippine High School for the Arts (PHSA) graduates who have exhibited outstanding academic and artistic excellence in their years in high school has been awarded to recipients in the graduation last March 22 as MARIA-IRM Scholarship Award, with the initials of Imelda Romualdez-Marcos added to it.

PHSA, atop Mt. Makiling was established in 1977, a year after Former President Ferdinand E. Marcos established National Arts Center (NAC) on April 16, 1976 as a tribute to Filipino artists. To date, PHSA serves as a training ground for students inclined in the arts with its secondary program integrated with a special curriculum in the arts. Currently, there are five (5) majors PHSA students could focus on namely, Creative Writing, Dance, Music, Theater, and Visual Arts.

Recipient of the MARIA Scholarship Award will be receiving monthly subsidy from the Cultural Center of the Philippines (CCP) Board for his/her tertiary education. It has been two years since the PHSA held a graduation ceremony due to the implementation of the K-12 Curriculum and in the graduation held on March 22, PHSA students were surprised that what for the longest time was called MARIA Scholarship, was now dubbed as MARIA-IRM with the initials of the wife of the former President turned Dictator added to it.

PHSA students denounced the renaming of the MARIA Scholarship as attaching the initials of Imelda Marcos would seem like the subsidy will be coming from her while in fact the subsidy is from the CCP board and the Marcos family have no direct influence on the scholarship. In a statement released by Variations, PHSA’s student publication, they wrote, “adding the initials of the wife of the president, turned dictator, would imply that it is them who are responsible for helping the students through their tertiary education, when in fact, it is the taxes of the Filipino people.”

Variations also emphasized in their statement that the MARIA Scholarship was initially called MARIA-IRM however it was changed into MARIA Scholarship after Executive Order No. 420 “Converting the Philippine High School for the Arts into a Regular Government Agency,” thus unlinking the school from the Marcos family.

Students also pointed out that in the 2003 PHSA Student Handbook, the scholarship was referred to as MARIA Scholarship whereas in the recently distributed 2015 PHSA Student Handbook, the scholarship is recognized as MARIA-IRM.

Variations strongly denounced the move of the administration to rename the scholarship and the administration’s lack of transparency regarding the matter, Variations wrote, “to name the scholarship after the founders is simply ignorance, and the choice to unlearn what the mountains have taught.”

They also called out the administration’s reasoning that referring to the MARIA Scholarship as MARIA-IRM Scholarship during the graduation was a mistake from the script. Variations wrote, “to dub the incident as a ‘mistake from the script’ during the graduation is spineless.”

The statement released by Variations was first posted in their Facebook page but the post was taken down so the students reposted the statement in their personal accounts with Maura Aurel Yap, Editor-in-Chief (EIC) of Variations and Bianca Ysabel Rabe, President of the Supreme Student Government as signatories.

In an online interview with UPLB Perspective, Yap explained that the post was taken down by one of their staff after their adviser asked them to remove the post. The students were able to repost the statement with the provision in Section 6 of the Campus Journalism Act saying that “the function of the adviser is limited to one of technical guidance,” as basis for posting it despite the adviser’s prohibition.

With regard the administration’s silence on the matter, Variations wrote in their statement, “the media blackout from our school administration is simply proof that something happened without any of the students’ knowledge or consent. As journalists it is our duty to tell the truth, and to tell it well.”

Variations together with the PHSA students are waiting for answers from their administration who has remained silent all throughout. Yap, EIC of Variations who recently graduated, said in an interview with UPLB Perspective “What is the school admin afraid of? Why are they trying to hide the issue? Our school has been silent long enough. It’s time to speak up.”[P]

 

FEATURES: Boundaries

Jeep

Every night, Emmanuel religiously portions his daily earnings to put food for seven on the table, to send five to get attractive college diplomas, and to pay for the house’s water and electricity.

Ruel and Emmanuel make roughly around ₱500 daily as drivers.

In jeepney modernization program by the government, Ruel and Emmanuel have to feed one more mouth – debt.

Environmentally friendly but anti-poor

Bibilhin daw nila yung jeep namin sa halagang ₱30,000 tapos bibilhin namin sa kanila yung higit ₱1.5 milyon bagong jeep tapos may tubo pa yun kaya aabot ng ₱2 milyon (They say they will purchase our jeep with ₱30,000 and we will acquire the new jeeps for ₱1.5 million but if you add interest it will be worth ₱2 million),”

Ruel describes the scheme.

Under this scheme, jeepney drivers will only receive ₱30,000 as salvage fee for their old jeepneys which the government will dispose. Drivers will also receive ₱80,000 as subsidy from the government for the acquisition of new jeepneys. However the ₱110,000 they receive is still peanuts compared to the amount of ₱1.5 million they will be paying in 7 years. According to IBON, a progressive think tank, the current jeepneys cost only ₱200,000-₱400,000. The current jeepney costs almost one-seventh of the new jeepney.

Jeepney units include non-air conditioned, air conditioned, solar powered, and produce lower emissions. The new jeepney units are Euro 4 compliant meaning they emit less smoke and pollutants. Currently the jeepneys that dominate the Philippine roads are only Euro 2 and 3 compliant. The government claims to lessen pollution, the country needs to transition to new jeepneys.

The government says that it will provide loans to jeepney drivers. However, Ruel and Emmanuel think that the price of environmental protection are their livelihoods.

They pay the daily boundary or rent of  ₱450-500 and usually bring home ₱500. In the new scheme, they have to pay ₱800 as boundary to compensate for the incurred debts.

With the new jeepneys, Emmanuel says the costs of purchasing new jeepneys are also passed down to consumers who will have to pay a minimum of ten pesos to ride the jeepney. Emmanuel estimates the minimum fare will be around ₱10, higher by ₱3 from the current regular fare.

Lalaki pa huhulugan namin araw-araw (Our daily contributions will balloon),” Ruel is pertaining to the interest they have to pay every day to compensate for the possible debts to be incurred.

Jeepney drivers are made to choose between transition to modern jeepneys or loyalty to old jeepneys at the cost of their registration.

While fireworks and ringing bells will greet many Filipinos during New Year’s Day next year; announcements of revocation of jeepney registration will knock the doors of many jeepney drivers on New Year’s Day.

H’wag sana kaming pabayaan ng gobyerno. May lima akong anak na nag-aaral. Kung mawawalan kami ng pangkabuhayan, saan pupunta mga anak ko? Hindi na namin kakakayanin yun (I hope the government does not abandon us. I have five children who are studying. If I lose my livelihood, where will my children go? We can not absorb that),” says Ruel.

Hindi kasya yung kita namin ngayon at dadagdagan pa nila yung pahirap (Our earnings are insufficient and they’ll add to our burden),” says Emmanuel.

The issue of money awakened the creases on Ruel’s face. It did not matter to him if he lost count of the attempts jeepney drivers did to demand dialogues with the government as long as he will not see the day counting his daily earnings to pennies as few as his fingers because of debt.

Ruel can not count the number of words they heard from the government with regards to their plight but he could vividly recount the words Duterte threw to jeepney drivers.

“January 1, if you can’t modernize that, leave. You’re poor? Son of a bitch, go ahead, suffer in poverty and hunger, I don’t care.” Duterte said this while addressing soldiers in Marawi last week.

Binoto namin siya dahil gusto namin ng pagbabago sa ekonomiya (We voted for him because we wanted change in the economy),” Ruel admits he and his friends voted for Duterte.

Hindi niya tinupad ang pangako niya na tulungan ang mga mahihirap (He did not fulfill his promise to help the impoverished),” says Emmanuel while repairing his jeepney. Ruel nods in frustration.

If the government would shoulder all or half the ₱1.5 million, Ruel and Manuel said they will support the modernization program. “Kung nakakagaan po ng buhay namin at ng iba, susupportahan namin ang gobyerno (If it eases our life and other people’s lives, we will support the government),” said Ruel.

Students weigh

Paralyzed by nationwide strikes and disappointed with the recent national events, students have weighed their sentiments against the government policy. Denouncing it as ‘non-inclusive’ and ‘favoring only the elites’.

Clarenz Ocampo, a junior human ecology student, thinks that the program is “unfair” as jeepneys are coerced to transition in a very short amount of time without ample government aid. “Mababawasan yung ratio of passengers to jeepneys thus mahirap makasakay. Pangalawa, Mas mahal na bayad para macompensate yung gastos of the “modernization” plan (The ratio of passengers to jeepneys will be lower which worsens commuter experience. Secondly, a higher fare will be imposed to compensate for the cost of the modernization plan),” says Ocampo.

Christian Dulay, a senior agribusiness student, says “It’s a bold and progressive move, but it’s not inclusive. There is a great trade off once it is implemented. For sure implementation would be the greatest bottleneck of the program. I’m not entirely against the mandate of the program, but it is not viable as of the moment.”

It’s not only the drivers who will be affected by this abrupt transition. Students and ordinary workers have to shell out extra for their once affordable jeepney rides.

“Mas mahihirapan kami, wala talaga kaming kakakayanan (We’ll be overburdened, we really do not have the capacity to go against it),” Emmanuel says as tears crawled down his cheeks.

Emmanuel touches the rosary, says a prayer under his breath before his next journey.

He finally says,

“Sana hindi matuloy. (I hope it does not push through)”[P]

WORDS: John Albert Pagunsan; GRAPHICS: Jandelle Cruz

 

The Difference between Fake News and Satire, and Why It Matters

 

22278384_1827723750588270_2135893568_n

On September 2017, Philstar.com (The Philippine Star) reported that “spreading fake news [is] now a crime” after President Duterte signed into law Republic Act 10951. They pointed out that Article 154, Section 18 of the act sanctions “unlawful use of means of publication and unlawful utterances”, imposing a penalty of arresto mayor and a hefty fine upon those who publish false news.

This penalty is imposed upon “Any person who by means of printing, lithography, or any other means of publication shall publish or cause to be published as news any false news which may endanger the public order, or cause damage to the interest or credit of the State,” as stated in the article. But what The Philippine Star got wrong that Republic Act 10951 merely amends the Revised Penal Code, which was passed in 1930, to hike fines matching their 2017 monetary equivalent.

In layman’s terms, this law already exists, and the outdated penalty for Article 154 was simply adjusted from 1,000 pesos maximum to a fine ranging from 40, 000 to 200, 000 pesos plus up to six months jail time. In layman’s terms, President Duterte did not sign an entirely new law on fake news and that The Philippine Star more or less misled its readers into believing there was, in fact, a new law on fake news.

Short quiz: Does this mean The Philippine Star actually published fake news for posting that headline? Should The Philippine Star be penalized under the law for spreading false news and arguably causing damage to the credit of the State? Wait, if they didn’t write it intentionally, does it actually count as fake news?

There is no doubt that the prevalence of fake news has had a negative impact on our society and that there needs to be a solution. However, the lines remain blurred in the current law and in the proposed Senate Bill No. 1492 or “Anti-Fake News Act of 2017” introduced by Senator Joel Villanueva. Considering how the current administration has been, the arguments against and the descriptors for “fake news” could be used by those in power to take away press freedom and our right to freely express ourselves.

DEFINING ‘FAKE NEWS’                                

Academics Hunt Allcott and Matthew Gentzkow in their article “Social Media and Fake News in the 2016 Election” published in the Journal of Economic Perspectives in 2017 defined fake news to be “news articles that are intentionally and verifiably false, and could mislead readers.”

fakenews.gfx

Immediately, so many articles come to mind. We have the more “blatant” political propaganda fake news that’s used to damage the credibility of both the State and the opposition. We have fake science news (or poorly-communicated research findings) that have been around way before the Duterte-Trump era. We’ve seen unverified news posted by social media users claiming there’s a thing happening somewhere, like a terrorist attack, or a bomb threat. There’s also tabloid news, hybrids of factual-and-fake news, and even satirical news (more on that later).

 

In the case of The Philippine Star, the headline is verifiably false and has certainly already misled some its readers; however, we can’t say for sure whether the author did it intentionally. While Philstar is among the Philippines’ most widely-circulated

newspapers that have been around for decades alongside The Philippine Daily Inquirer, and Manila Bulletin, to name a few, we should always be reminded that mass media is prone to conflict of interest.

First and foremost, mass media is a business that needs the occasional sensationalist, click-snatching headline to gain website views and ad revenue. Secondly, mass media is monitored and controlled by certain individuals and individual groups who could very easily twist facts and churn out disinformation. And lastly, although it is in the interest of journalism to deliver factual and substantial news, sometimes we make mistakes in an effort to provide it as soon as it happens.

So what if it was a mistake? UP College of Mass Communication Associate Professor Danilo Arao says “honest mistakes should not be classified as fake news.” Errors in media reportage could be linked to editors and writers who fail to uphold the professional and ethical standards of journalism. Some might also need to have a background on law or whatever topic in order to communicate a story better. There also needs to be self-regulation among journalists and concerned citizens, who can point out bad practices. Initiatives and organizations such as VERA Files, National Union of Journalists of the Philippines, and IBON Foundation regularly do fact-checks. Ideally, media organizations that have been called out shall correct and apologize for their errors.

THE DIFFERENCE BETWEEN SATIRE AND FAKE NEWS

Another form of “fake news” that should not be classified as such is satire. You’ve probably seen satirical news on your Facebook timeline, posted by The Onion or The Superficial Gazette. If you haven’t heard of them, you can also check out our lampoon issue called UPLB Defective. Arao says that satire professionally-done can help shape public opinion by making audiences think through an exaggerated depiction of reality. Unfortunately, satire done badly exists, and they are often misinterpreted by readers.

If you look back at history, satire was used in times of crisis, particularly during the Martial Law Period where the Marcos regime closed down several broadsheets and radio stations. Campus publications like The Philippine Collegian and Ang Malaya as well as underground publications Pahayagang Malaya and Veritas were among those used satire to voice out against the authoritarian government. Even in the American Colonial Period, satire existed in the forms of prose and editorial cartoons when writers did not have press freedom. Perhaps the most historical and well-known satire is Jose Rizal’s El Filibusterismo and Noli Me Tangere, which were crucial in winning our independence.

All of those mentioned could be easily tagged as “fake news” under the law and the proposed Anti-Fake News Act. But what makes them different is that satire essentially performs the function of journalism by educating its readers and showing what is true and just. It is still unclear whether coming up with a clear definition of “fake news” is possible without trampling on our right to exercise press freedom, or if a definition is something that we even need, but for now it is important that we promote free, accessible education for all and critical media literacy so that we can distinguish fact from fiction.[P]

 

Written by Mac Andre Arboleda. This article was first published on print, UPLB Perspective Vol. 44, Issue 1. 

NEWS: LB-AAW calls for adoption of remaining dogs

LB-AAW

Threatened by the local municipality to have the dogs euthanized if not adopted before summer, the Los Baños – Advocates of Animal Welfare, Inc. (LB-AAW) are looking to find ‘furever’ homes for the remaining 23 dogs in the pound.

According to LB-AAW, the Los Baños municipal government wants to euthanize the dogs for fear of diseases like rabies, which they are more prone to during summer months. The municipality is also said to be cutting expenses for the allotment of other projects and that they are making room for a new batch of dogs in the pound.

Reignier Guerrero, LB-AAW Public Relations Head, stated that although the municipality said that there is a big amount allotted for dog food in the 2018 budget proposal, the amount is not disclosed to their organization. Additionally, he said that before their organization volunteered to help the pound, the dogs were not being fed. The food given to the dogs in present-day come from LB-AAW and their donors.

The municipality have long been saying that the dogs that are not adopted will be euthanized. However, it was only last January 13 when they gave their definite word that the current dogs in the pound will be given until before summer to find a home.

Their campaign #Savethe58 started out with 58 dogs that were up for adoption. With LB-AAW’s continuous efforts to find them new homes, more than half have already been adopted.

LB dog pound violates law                                                        

After finding homes for the remaining 23 dogs, LB-AAW wants to have the dog pound closed due to violation of the guidelines set by the Bureau of Animal Industry.

“Bagsak sila sa maintenance of facilities. Walang food for the dogs. Walang vet na nagche-check sa dogs. Hindi rin sumusunod sa required facilities ng cages, dapat stainless steel.” Guerrero explained.

According to Guerrero, there had been a case where a dog had a tetanus infection because of rust and dirt in its cage.

The dog pound is located in the Material Recycling Facility, also known as a dumpsite, which Guerrero said provides for  an unhealthy environment for dogs. He said that the municipality told them that there is no other land available to be converted into a dog pound and the current pound only serves as a temporary shelter.

Guerrero cited the Animal Welfare Act of 1998 which provides that animals in the shelter should have five basic freedoms: freedom from thirst, hunger, and malnutrition; freedom from physical discomfort and pain; freedom from injury and disease; freedom to conform to essential behavior patterns; and freedom from fear and distress.

An adoptionfee of Php 300 paid to the municipality should be used to improve the facilities of the pound but Guerrero observed that with the number of dogs adopted in the previous years, no improvements were seen in the pound.

Not all stray dogs are rabid

In an interview with ABS-CBN last January 18, OIC Municipal Agriculturist Cheryll Gonzales explained the risk of  stray dogs with rabies. Although they want the dogs to be in a better place, she said, they also do not want to risk the chances of rabies spreading and citizens being bitten by the rabid animals.

“Ang rabies kasi, in a few weeks, magmamanifest na dapat ang symptoms sa aso. If the dogs have rabies, it should have died or exhibited the symptoms,” Guerero explained that thedogs in the pound do not have rabies.

Animals infected with rabies die 10 days after the development of its symptoms.

#Savethe58

LB-AAW advocates to rescue and find new homes for stray cats and dogs which, according to them, are only victims of irresponsible pet ownership. From 2015, LB-AAW volunteers have helped in maintaining the dog pound—cleaning cages, feeding, bathing, and taking care of the dogs and cars. Since there is no municipal veterinarian, LB-AAW contacts local or private veterinarians for the animals that need immediate medical attention.

Since 2015, more than 50 cats and dogs have been adopted.

If interested to adopt, LB-AAW requires the submission of an application form, an interview, and a visit to the dog pound.[P]

For more information, see the guidelines and reminders in LB-AAW facebook group or contact Reignier Guerrero at 09978539393.

OPINYON: Magsulat, Maglingkod, Magpalaya

Defendpressfreedom3

Kamakailan lamang ay ating nabalitaan ang pagbawi ng Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) ng lisensya ng Rappler dahil sa di umanong pagmamayari ng dayuhan sa naturing online news media na lumalabag sa mga nakapaloob sa konsitusyon. Dagdag pa rito ay ang nabalitaang pag rekumenda ng National Telecommunications Commision (NTC) na ipasara ang 30 stasyon ng radyo sa Davao region dahil sa di umanong paglabag sa mga probisyon ng communications and broadcasting laws.

Kinikilala ang Pilipinas bilang isa sa mga ‘world’s freest media’, ngunit sa pag atake ng administrasyon sa mga mamamahayag ay umuusbong na ang mga nakakadudang elemento na nagpapahiwatig na ang naturing titulo ay di akma para sa mga pahayagan ng Pilipinas dahil sa mga kasalukuyang pangyayari sa bansa. Hindi lamang ito atake sa pahayagang Pilipino kundi atake ito sa pambasang demokrasya. Ito lamang ay isa sa mga paniniil ng mala-diktaduryang gobyerno sa patuloy nitong pagpwersa sa naisin na patahimikin ang mga malayang mamamahayag ng katotohanan para sa mga mamamayan.

Hindi lamang Rappler ang natatanging news media na nakatangap ng atake sa karapatan ng malayang pamamahayag, kundi pati na rin ang iba pang mga alternatibong pahayagang tina-tag ng Pangulo bilang mga komunista o miyembro ng New People’s Army. Dagdag pa rito ay ang pang haharass ng mga trolls sa mga progresibong indibidwal na nagpapahayag sa social media.

Ang atake sa mga media institutions ay isa lamang sa mga pamamaraan ng administrasyon upang mabaluktot ang katotohanan. Sa hangarin nitong maisulong ang diktadurya, napakaraming buhay na ang nakitil at dumanak na dugo, dagdag pa rito ay ang patuloy na unti-unting pagpatay sa mga Pilipino sa pamamagitan ng gutom at pangigipit – hindi na lamang naroon sa kanayunan ang pagatake sa karapatang pantao, makikita na rin ito sa kalunsuran sa porma ng extrajudicial killings at human rights violations na pinaigting ng War on Drugs ng Administrasyong Duterte.

Sa patuloy na pag-supil sa mga pahayagan na kiritikal na naghahatid ng balita at may mga pahayag na sumasalungat sa administrasyon ay unti-unting nailalantad ang pagnanais ni Duterte na mamonopolya ang katotohanan. Patuloy ang pag-gapos, pagpiring, at pagputol ng dila sa ating kalayaang magsalita at maghatid ng balita. Tila mahapong ginagamit ang lahat ng paraan para mapatahimik ang media, mainstream man o alternatibo, na sumasalungat sa propaganda ng estado.

Hindi maipagkakaila na ito ay sumasalamin sa nangyari noong panahon ni Marcos. Sa pagsulong ng ‘national security’ ng Armed Forces of the Philippines (AFP) ay ang pagtulak ng censorship at pagsasara ng maraming media institutions, kolektibo, at pati na rin mga student councils. Sa malinaw na hangarin ng Pangulo na palawakin sa buong bansa ang Batas Militar ay dapat na mabahala ngayon pa lamang at manindigan ang mga Pilipino laban dito.

Sa panahong harap-harapan nang  binubusalan ng administrasyon ang mga mamamahayag at mamamayang Pilipino, pinapakita lamang na hindi ito panahon ng pananahimik ngunit ito na ay panahon para sa mas paigtingin ang mga panawagan at ang mas kritkal na pagsusuri sa mga polisiya ng ating administrasyon. Sa panahong harap-harapan nang tinatangalan ng karapatan sa malayang pamamahayag at inaatake ang ating mga demokratikong karapatan, ang mga media institutions ay mas paiigtingin at papalakasin ang boses ng mamayan at mga estudyanteng kanilang nirerepresenta.

Ang UPLB Perspective, bilang isang pahayagang umusbong sa karimlan ng Batas Militar ay patuloy na magsusulat, maglilingkod, at magpapalaya, dahil may kalayaan sa katotohanan. Kasama ang masa at iba pang institusyon ng pamamahayag – sa larangan man ng imprenta, brodkast, o online – patuloy ang UPLB Perspective sa militante at progresibong pagtuligsa at paglaban sa tiranya, pasismo, at namumuong diktadura ng rehimeng Duterte.